|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||||
| Cultural Significance | Navajo Taboos |
|
|
Navajo
Taboos
Seasonal taboos prohibiting string games in the summer are rooted in the concept of the Holy People. Griffin-Pierce provides an explanation:
The Holy People are everywhere, as Mike Mitchell explains:
Mitchells last statement is a reference to seasonal taboos. Jack Page provides key details:
Further details are supplied by Mike Mitchell in his recent booklet on string games:
Clearly, seasonal taboos prohibiting string games are widespread and well established among the Navajo. But practically speaking, what gave rise to this taboo? One can only speculate. Traditionally, spring, summer, and fall were the seasons in which all members of a tribe or extended family, even children, needed to focus on the production and storage of food for the coming winter. Their survival depended on it. Individuals who devoted too much time to leisure activities jeopardized the welfare of the entire tribe by not contributing fully to the labor pool. For an adult this concept is easy to grasp, but since children usually do not respond to reasoning, perhaps parents developed scare tactics to discourage the unwanted behavior. These threats were later immortalized as taboos. Sustenance-based arguments may well explain seasonal taboos of the past, but how about today, when canned goods and supplies are readily available on the reservation? Why are string games still played only in winter? One of Pages informants summed it up nicely: If it wasnt for these string games, we Navajos would go crazy in the wintertime. Theres practically nothing to do this time of year with all this snow (Page and Page 1995:112). Thus, by voluntarily restricting string games to the winter season, the society maintains their magic, luster, and entertainment value year after year. Anglos do the same when they pack up their Christmas ornaments in January (why not celebrate Christmas year round?). But some taboos defy explanation. For example, mother-in-laws are not supposed to look at their son-in-laws. This taboo is immortalized in the string game Two Hogans Facing in Opposite Directions (Opposite Hogans). Navajo children will still warn their visiting grandmother that their father is approaching, at which point she will leave. It would be rude for her to remain, just as it would be rude for her son-in-law to visit her hogan unannounced. The only explanation ever given for this custom is that it avoids a lot of trouble in the family. (Locke 1992:22).
|
|||||
|
|
Navajo word display problems? Please install the Verdana Navajo font, downloadable by clicking HERE.
Designed and produced by Paradox Productions |